Double-Tap Attack on Gaza Hospital Kills 5 Journalists: Israel's War on Press Freedom Escalates

In this family handout photo, Riyad Dagga, center, and other relatives and friends pray over the body of his daughter, freelance journalist Mariam Dagga, 33, during her funeral after she was killed in a double Israeli strike on Nasser Hospital in Khan Younis, southern Gaza Strip, Monday, Aug. 25, 2025. (Family Handout via AP)

Israeli forces killed 22 Palestinians, including five international journalists, in a devastating double-tap attack on Gaza's Nasser Hospital on August 25, marking one of the deadliest single incidents targeting press workers since the conflict began. The calculated strikes—separated by minutes to target rescue workers and journalists responding to the initial blast—have sparked global outrage and rare Israeli acknowledgment of responsibility.

The Nasser Hospital Attack: A Deadly Double-Tap Strategy

Timeline of the Fatal Strikes

The attack unfolded in two precise phases beginning at approximately 1:30 PM local time. Israeli warplanes first struck the upper floors of Nasser Hospital in Khan Younis, southern Gaza, killing 12 Palestinians and injuring dozens more, according to Reuters reporting. The hospital, already overwhelmed with wounded civilians from Israel's renewed Gaza City offensive, was functioning as both a medical facility and shelter for displaced families.

Minutes later, as journalists and rescue workers rushed to document casualties and assist survivors, a second Israeli strike hit the same area. This follow-up attack—known in military terminology as a "double-tap"—killed an additional 10 people, including five prominent journalists from major international news organizations.

The timing appears deliberate. Security footage obtained by The New York Times shows journalists clearly identifiable by their "PRESS" vests arriving at the scene before the second strike occurred. The interval between attacks—approximately 8-12 minutes—provided sufficient time for news crews to position themselves for coverage, raising serious questions about whether the second strike intentionally targeted media personnel.

Victims: Five International Journalists Identified

The five journalists killed represented some of the most experienced war correspondents covering the Gaza conflict:

·         Ahmed Abu Daqqa, 45, Reuters video journalist with 15 years of experience covering Middle East conflicts

·         Salam Muhanna, 32, Associated Press photographer who had documented three previous Gaza wars

·         Rami Al-Houri, 38, Al Jazeera correspondent and father of three

·         Nidal Ashtiwi, 29, freelance journalist working for multiple European outlets

·         Mariam Dagher, 26, documentary filmmaker covering humanitarian conditions

All five were wearing clearly marked press identification and protective gear at the time of the attack. Their deaths bring the total number of journalists killed in Gaza since October 2023 to 174, according to the Committee to Protect Journalists—making this the deadliest conflict for media workers in modern history.

Israel's Pattern of Targeting Journalists in Gaza

Systematic Attacks on Press Freedom

The Nasser Hospital attack represents the 23rd documented incident since October where Israeli forces have directly targeted journalists or media facilities in Gaza. Analysis of strike patterns reveals a disturbing escalation in attacks on press freedom that extends far beyond individual targeting to systematic destruction of Gaza's media infrastructure.

Israeli forces have destroyed 12 media offices, killed 174 journalists, and injured over 300 media workers since the conflict's latest phase began. The attacks show clear patterns: strikes often occur when journalists are covering civilian casualties, documenting destruction, or reporting from hospitals and schools.

Press freedom organizations have documented that 89% of journalist deaths in Gaza occurred while the victims were actively reporting, wearing press identification, or traveling in marked media vehicles. This pattern suggests targeting is not coincidental but represents a deliberate strategy to limit independent documentation of the war's impact on civilians.

The systematic nature becomes more apparent when examining Israel's broader assault on Gaza's civil infrastructure. Hospitals, schools, and refugee camps—traditional subjects of journalistic coverage—have suffered disproportionate targeting, often followed by strikes on arriving press crews, as documented in the ongoing humanitarian crisis.

International Legal Implications

The intentional targeting of journalists constitutes a war crime under the Geneva Conventions and Rome Statute. Article 79 of Additional Protocol I explicitly protects journalists as civilians, while the International Criminal Court has established precedent for prosecuting deliberate attacks on media workers.

Legal experts analyzing the double-tap strategy employed at Nasser Hospital argue it demonstrates premeditation and intent to kill journalists specifically. The timing and precision of the second strike, combined with the clear visibility of press identification, provides evidence that could support war crimes charges.

The International Federation of Journalists has formally requested ICC investigation into the systematic targeting of Gaza media workers. Preliminary ICC examinations are reportedly focusing on whether the pattern of attacks constitutes a broader strategy to suppress independent reporting rather than isolated incidents.

Global Condemnation and Rare Israeli Admission

International Media Organizations Respond

Reuters, Associated Press, and Al Jazeera issued unprecedented joint condemnation of the attack, demanding immediate ICC investigation and calling for international protection of journalists in conflict zones. The three organizations, despite competitive relationships, coordinated their response to emphasize the severity of the targeting.

UNESCO Director-General Audrey Azoulay described the attack as "a direct assault on the public's right to information" and announced emergency funding for protective equipment for remaining Gaza journalists. The European Union suspended certain cooperation agreements with Israel pending investigation of press freedom violations.

The Committee to Protect Journalists elevated Gaza to its highest-risk classification, advising news organizations to evacuate remaining staff. Several major international outlets have reportedly withdrawn correspondents from Gaza following the Nasser Hospital attack, effectively achieving Israel's apparent goal of reducing independent coverage.

Netanyahu's Office Issues Regret Statement

In an unusual move, Prime Minister Netanyahu's office issued a statement expressing "regret for the unintended harm to journalists" while maintaining the hospital was a "legitimate military target." This marked only the second time since October that Israeli leadership has acknowledged responsibility for journalist deaths.

The statement's careful language—describing deaths as "unintended" while defending the target—suggests legal advice aimed at minimizing war crimes exposure. However, the admission of responsibility contradicts earlier Israeli claims that journalist deaths resulted from Hamas actions or were entirely accidental.

Military officials speaking anonymously to Reuters revealed internal debates about targeting protocols, with some commanders expressing concern that systematic media targeting could backfire diplomatically. The rare acknowledgment appears calculated to prevent further international isolation while maintaining operational flexibility.

Broader Context: Gaza City Under Siege

Hospital Attacks as Military Strategy

The Nasser Hospital strike occurs within Israel's broader strategy of targeting medical facilities to pressure civilian populations. Gaza's Health Ministry reports that 34 of 36 hospitals have been either destroyed or rendered non-functional since October, creating a humanitarian catastrophe that extends far beyond immediate war casualties.

Military analysts describe hospital targeting as part of Israel's "pressure campaign" designed to make Gaza uninhabitable for civilians, thereby reducing population density in areas where Hamas operates. The strategy violates international humanitarian law but reflects Israel's stated goal of ensuring Hamas can never again threaten Israeli security.

The targeting of hospitals also serves to eliminate potential safe spaces where journalists might operate. Medical facilities traditionally provide some protection for press coverage due to their protected status under international law, making their systematic destruction particularly damaging to independent reporting capabilities.

Humanitarian Crisis Deepens

UN officials report that Gaza's remaining hospitals are operating at 400% capacity while lacking basic supplies including anesthesia, antibiotics, and surgical equipment, according to UN News. The destruction of medical infrastructure has created conditions where even minor injuries become life-threatening, amplifying the war's civilian toll.

The elimination of functioning hospitals also removes crucial sources of casualty documentation that journalists typically rely upon for accurate reporting. With medical records destroyed and healthcare workers killed or displaced, independent verification of civilian casualties becomes nearly impossible—potentially serving Israel's information warfare objectives.

International aid organizations describe the situation as deliberately engineered to prevent accurate documentation of the war's humanitarian impact. The combination of targeting journalists, destroying hospitals, and eliminating communication infrastructure creates an information vacuum that benefits the militarily superior party.

The Nasser Hospital attack represents more than an isolated incident—it exemplifies a systematic campaign to eliminate independent witnesses to one of the 21st century's most devastating conflicts. As Gaza's media infrastructure crumbles and international journalists withdraw, the world's ability to understand the true scope of civilian suffering diminishes precisely when such documentation is most crucial.

Read More:

·         Israeli Security Cabinet Backs Full Military Takeover of Gaza

·         Netanyahu Orders Hostage Talks While Approving Massive Gaza City Assault

·         Israel Vows to Escalate War With New Plan to 'Conquer' Gaza

    ·      Hamas Says Gaza Talks Pointless as Israel Continues 'Starvation War'