The rallying cry echoed through airport terminals across Canada: "Unpaid work won't fly." When Air Canada flight attendants walked off the job last week, they exposed a labor practice so entrenched in North American aviation that most passengers had never heard of it.
For decades, cabin crew have worked for free during the most stressful parts of their job - boarding passengers, conducting safety checks, and managing ground delays. Now, a historic tentative agreement has emerged that could reshape how airlines treat their workers across the continent.
The four-day strike, which disrupted peak summer travel and affected thousands of passengers, culminated in what union leaders called a "groundbreaking" deal. The Canadian Union of Public Employees (CUPE) secured at least 60 minutes of ground pay before each flight, marking the first time a major Canadian carrier has agreed to compensate cabin crew for pre-flight work.
The Economics of Unpaid Labor
The scale of unpaid work in aviation is staggering. According to union surveys, Air Canada flight attendants performed an average of 35 hours of unpaid work monthly - equivalent to nearly a full work week without compensation.
Leslie Woolaver, a longtime Air Canada flight attendant, estimated she worked approximately 40 hours monthly without pay, primarily during boarding procedures and flight delays. This practice is standard across North American aviation, affecting not just Air Canada but carriers like WestJet, Air Transat, and major U.S. airlines including United Airlines.
The financial impact hits junior flight attendants hardest. The Globe and Mail reported that some entry-level cabin crew earn less than minimum wage when unpaid hours are factored into their total compensation.
Traditional airline pay structures compensate flight attendants only from "brake release to brake set" - meaning from when the aircraft begins moving at departure until it stops at the destination. Everything before and after, including passenger boarding, safety demonstrations, and aircraft preparation, goes uncompensated.
Breaking Point: How COVID Changed Everything
The pandemic fundamentally altered cabin crew responsibilities, creating what labor experts describe as the tipping point for this decades-old practice.
Steven Tufts, a labor expert at York University in Toronto, explained that new health protocols and "increased complexity of boarding passengers put a lot of pressure on flight attendants" and forced them to work additional unpaid hours.
Enhanced cleaning procedures, mask enforcement, and health screenings added significant time to pre-flight duties, all while flight attendants remained uncompensated for this essential work.
"Eventually they said: 'No. This has to change,'" Tufts noted.
The union's resistance to a federal back-to-work order demonstrated the depth of worker frustration. When the Canadian government invoked Section 107 of the Canada Labour Code - typically used to force binding arbitration - flight attendants continued their strike, garnering unprecedented public support.
The Precedent That Started It All
The movement toward ground pay began south of the border. Delta Airlines became the first major North American carrier in 2022 to pay flight attendants for ground work, quickly followed by American Airlines and Alaska Airlines.
These U.S. carriers recognized that modern flight operations, with their complex boarding procedures and frequent delays, required compensating cabin crew for all work performed, not just time in the air.
The success of these programs provided a roadmap for Canadian flight attendants and demonstrated that ground pay was both operationally feasible and economically sustainable for major airlines.
Public Opinion and Political Pressure
What made this strike different was overwhelming public sympathy for the workers. An Angus Reid Institute poll found that a majority of Canadians sided with flight attendants on the ground pay issue when they learned about the practice.
The poll revealed that many Canadians were shocked to discover flight attendants worked without compensation during boarding and ground delays. This public awareness shifted the political dynamics, making it difficult for the government to simply force workers back to their jobs.
John Gradek, an aviation management expert at McGill University, called the union's strategy "a master class of negotiation," noting that focusing on unpaid work rather than just wage increases created a more compelling narrative.
The Tentative Deal and Its Implications
The proposed agreement includes several significant provisions beyond the historic ground pay component. Air Canada offered a 38 percent total compensation increase over four years, with a 25 percent bump in the first year alone.
However, flight attendant reactions remain mixed. While the union secured ground pay, reports suggest many workers wanted full compensation (100 percent of hourly rates) rather than the partial payment included in the deal.
The tentative agreement still requires ratification by the union membership, and Reuters reported that some flight attendants remain dissatisfied with the terms, particularly regarding how ground pay affects entry-level worker compensation.
Continental Transformation
Industry experts predict this deal will trigger widespread changes across North American aviation. Gradek forecasts a "tsunami" effect, with other Canadian carriers forced to match Air Canada's ground pay provisions to remain competitive.
Both Air Transat and WestJet face upcoming contract negotiations where ground pay is expected to be a central issue. The precedent set by Air Canada, combined with existing U.S. practices, creates pressure for industry-wide adoption.
Porter Airlines, a smaller Canadian carrier, has already begun paying flight attendants for at least part of boarding time, indicating that competitive pressures are already influencing compensation structures.
Broader Labor Implications
The Air Canada strike represents more than just one union's victory - it signals a potential shift in Canadian labor relations. The union's successful resistance to a federal back-to-work order could embolden other workers facing similar government intervention.
This resistance comes as Canada grapples with increased use of back-to-work legislation in recent years, with critics arguing that such measures undermine genuine collective bargaining.
The focus on unpaid work also resonates beyond aviation, potentially influencing other industries where workers perform uncompensated tasks as part of their duties.
International Context
While North American airlines have traditionally avoided paying for ground work, the practice differs significantly in other regions. European carriers often use monthly salary structures rather than hourly pay, naturally including all work performed regardless of aircraft movement.
This fundamental difference in compensation philosophy highlights how regional labor practices and regulations can create vastly different working conditions in the same global industry.
Looking Forward
As Air Canada flight attendants prepare to vote on the tentative agreement, the aviation industry watches closely. A ratified deal would cement ground pay as a new industry standard, while rejection could lead to continued labor unrest and further negotiations.
The outcome will likely influence not just Canadian aviation but potentially spark similar movements among U.S. flight attendants still fighting for comprehensive ground pay coverage.
For passengers, the long-term impact may be positive. Better-compensated, less-stressed cabin crew typically provide superior service and maintain higher safety standards - benefits that could justify any resulting fare increases.
The Air Canada strike has illuminated a practice hidden in plain sight, forcing the aviation industry to confront the reality that essential safety and service work deserves compensation, regardless of whether the aircraft is moving.
As one union leader declared when the tentative deal was announced: unpaid work in aviation may finally be "over."
Read More:
0 Comments